Effect of Agro.Bio Products on Enhancing the Resistance of Tall Ailanthus, Lilacs, and Hybrid Honeysuckle to Air Pollution from Industrial Clusters

Atmospheric pollution from coke production emissions is highly toxic to living organisms. With the current level of purification and disposal of industrial gases and aerosols from the coke industry, it is impossible to completely degas atmospheric pollutants using technical means alone. Given that plants have the ability to absorb a number of compounds toxic to humans from the atmosphere (sulfur dioxide, chlorine, hydrogen fluoride, and a number of hydrocarbons), one of the most pressing issues in plant physiology is the development of theoretical foundations for biological atmospheric purification. Research on specific types of industrial pollutants is particularly important.

According to scientists, industrial regions of Ukraine are characterized by a specific type of industrial air pollution, "Ukrainian smog," which contains a significant number of compounds of both oxidizing and reducing nature. The specific topography and climate somewhat reduce the level of ground-level atmospheric pollution in this zone. Similar phenomena are also clearly evident in the Dnipropetrovsk region, where plants and wildlife are exposed to emissions from the metallurgical, chemical, coke, cement, and mining industries. Among the most toxic volatile compounds, sulfur dioxide and phenols are particularly noteworthy, emitted into the atmosphere by a number of enterprises, particularly coke plants.

Sulfur dioxide is known to cause specific damage to plant foliage. Phenols released into the atmosphere during wet coke slaking contribute to widespread damage to plant leaves, the severity of which increases significantly toward the end of the growing season. Despite the significant toxicity of these ingredients, a large group of plants with certain morphological and biochemical characteristics exhibit resistance to coke plant emissions. Recent research has demonstrated the ability of these plants to capture and possibly partially metabolize certain compounds from the atmosphere of coke plants. Clearly, damaged foliage cannot effectively absorb toxic volatile compounds from the atmosphere. Creating an effective green filter around sources of industrial air pollution requires not only the development of a range of accumulator plants but also methods for increasing their resistance to toxic compounds.

Organic fertilizers occupy a prominent place among existing methods for increasing plant gas resistance. This is due to the fact that the soil where factories are located is depleted of nutrients and saturated with various industrial wastes. However, the range of traditional fertilizers is still quite limited. For a long time, humus or peat extracts were primarily used. Until recently, extensive data on the use of effective innovative systems such as modern highly purified humic preparations in industrial settings was lacking. Gardeners and landscapers at factories urgently need recommendations on the use of a diverse range of organic fertilizers.

In this regard, the task was set to study the possibility of using humic fertilizers to increase the resistance of plants to coke plant emissions and to provide recommendations for their use for trees, shrubs, and lawn plants.

In 2026, experimental plantings of ailanthus alta, white lilac, and cocksfoot were established in the coke planting and rectification facilities of the Kamensk Coke and Chemical Plant. Physiologically active forms of humic acid were administered in the form of Agro.Bio's Potassium Humate and applied alongside nitrophoska.

Experimental design: Option 1 — control #1 without fertilizers; Option 2 — control #2 — nitrophoska; Option 3 — nitrophoska + Agro.Bio Potassium Humate of the first concentration; Option 4 — nitrophoska + Agro.Bio Potassium Humate of the second concentration. Nitrophoska application rates were as follows: 250 g per bush, 300 g per tree, and 300 g per garden bed. An aqueous solution of Agro.Bio Potassium Humate was used in two concentrations: 0.0005 and 0.001%.

Leaf damage during the growing season was used as one of the key indicators of the experimental plants' morphological gas resistance. The percentage of leaf damage was calculated based on the ratio of damaged to undamaged areas. The data were collected during the 2024-2025 growing seasons, from May to October. The data were processed mathematically using the large-sample method at the 95% significance level.

Observations of the nature and dynamics of damage to experimental plants under coke plant conditions revealed that damage to plant leaves from coke plant emissions is dynamic and is characterized by a gradual increase toward the end of the growing season (Ailanthus alte and Cocksfoot). This pattern also holds true for treatments with humate application.

The appearance of leaf damage on ailanthus and lilac is essentially identical: dark brown, almost black, spots scattered diffusely across the leaf surface, combined with dark, often dead, leaf tips. By the end of the growing season, the percentage of damage (Tables 1 and 2) reached 52% for ailanthus and 71% for lilac in control sample No. 1.

Table 1. Damage to leaves of Ailanthus alta under coke plant conditions

Experimental variant May X±SX June X±SX July X±SX August X±SX September X±SX October X±SX
Control No. 1 17±0,13 18,1±1 19±0,2 28±2 40±8 52,1±6,1
Control No. 2 (nitrophoska) 15±1,1 17,0±2 18,5±1 23±4 38±6 46,2±4,0
Nitrophoska + Potassium Humate Agro.Bio 0.0005% 9±0,5 14,7±1 16±3 20±4 33±2 43±0,8
Nitrophoska + Potassium Humate Agro.Bio 0.001% 7±0,4 9,12±2 12±4 19±3 21±4 29±1,1

Table 2. Damage to cocksfoot leaves in a coke plant

Experimental variant May X±SX June X±SX July X±SX August X±SX September X±SX
Control No. 1 1±0,4 8,1±7 12±7 20±0,7 22,2±8,3
Control No. 2 (nitrophoska) 0 1,2±0,2 11,1±4 16±4 20,1±3
Agro.Bio Potassium Humate 0.0005% + Nitrophoska 0 1,0±0,2 12±0,4 10,1±2 16,2±2
Agro.Bio Potassium Humate 0.001% + Nitrophoska 0 0,9±0,3 9,0±0,6 14±2 13,1±3

At the same time, the orchardgrass leaves were characterized by the presence of elongated, light yellow spots that gradually enlarged. The leaf tips were also drying out. The damage rate by the end of the growing season was 22.2%.

The application of Agro.Bio Potassium Humate in combination with nitrophoska provides a better effect in reducing leaf damage to Ailanthus alta than nitrophoska alone. In the nitrophoska-based treatment, leaf damage was reduced by 0.5-16% compared to control #1, while in the nitrophoska + Agro.Bio Potassium Humate (0.0005%) treatment, it was reduced by 2.8-9%. The use of a double concentration of Agro.Bio Potassium Humate (0.001%) in combination with nitrophoska reduced damage by an average of 7-26%.

The same patterns were generally observed in the experiment with cocksfoot. The most effective combination was nitrophoska with Agro.Bio Potassium Humate at a concentration of 0.001% (Table 2).

The use of Agro.Bio Potassium Humate for growing white lilacs in a coke plant showed that the combined application of nitrophoska and Agro.Bio Potassium Humate at a concentration of 0.0005% reduced leaf damage by 0.3–38%, while the combined application of nitrophoska and Agro.Bio Potassium Humate at a concentration of 0.001% reduced leaf damage by 2–38% (Table 3). At the beginning of the growing season, no clear difference was observed between the treatments.

Table 3. Damage to white lilac leaves under coke plant conditions

Experimental variant May X±SX July X±SX August X±SX September X±SX October X±SX
Control No. 1 2,5±1 16,2±1 41±3 68±3 71±2,2
Control No. 2 (nitrophoska) 2,4±2 16,1±3 32±4 64±4 45±3,1
Nitrophoska + Potassium Humate Agro.Bio 0.0005% 2,8±1 22,2±1 24,1±2 30±2,1 57,1±4
Nitrophoska + Potassium Humate Agro.Bio 0.001% 2,3±1 6,5±2 38±4 30±3 35,5±2

The dynamics of some variants differed somewhat from the typical damage process in other experiments. This can be explained by the harsher conditions of the coke plant: slightly higher air temperature and a higher percentage of phenols in the atmosphere than in the distillation plant.

Interestingly, the nature of the damage changed slightly in the treatments using Agro.Bio Potassium Humate and nitrophoska. The color of the spots was less intense, and the number of dead leaf tips was reduced. These characteristics were common to all plant species included in the experiment.

Based on the presented data, it is obvious that further experiments on the use of humic preparations in various concentrations in combination with mineral backgrounds and modern microbiological destructors (such as the Totem Agro.Bio preparation for improving microflora) are advisable.

The quantitative application of the Agro.Bio Potassium Humate preparation must be varied taking into account the specific contaminants emitted in the area of ​​specific workshops.


Agro.Bio Expert Comment: The protective plant protection mechanisms described in the fundamental article have now been taken to a qualitatively new level thanks to the molecular activation of raw materials. The integration of modern, high-purity chelated complexes, such as Agro.Bio's Potassium Humate, allows for the creation of even more stable and durable "green filters" under the extreme anthropogenic pressure of Ukraine's industrial zones.

Write a review

Note: HTML is not translated!
    Bad           Good