Effectiveness of Organo-Mineral Humic Fertilizers with Localized Application in Southern Ukraine

Long-term research and field trials in farms of the Kherson region have confirmed the high effectiveness of organo-mineral humic fertilizers in the southern steppe zone of Ukraine.

Impact of Humic Fertilizers on Wheat Yield

The influence of humic fertilizers on spring and winter wheat yield was studied in field and production experiments. All experiments included an unfertilized control and a variant with granulated superphosphate at a rate of 40–50 kg/ha for pre-sowing application. Granulated superphosphate and organo-mineral humic fertilizer were applied using a grain seeder simultaneously with seed sowing. The results are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Effectiveness of Row Fertilization for Wheat
Year and Location of Experiment Grain Yield, c/ha
Control Granulated Superphosphate, 40–50 kg/ha Humic Fertilizer, 2 l/ha
Spring Wheat
2015, Plot No.1 18.2 19.0 20.7
2016, Plot No.1 15.7 16.8 17.7
2017, Plot No.1 12.7 13.6 14.2
Average Yield Increase - 1.0 2.6
Winter Wheat
2018–2019, Plot No.2 25.4 28.1 29.8
2019–2020, Plot No.3 19.3 20.8 21.8
2020–2021, Plot No.4 34.5 37.5 39.5
Average Yield Increase - 2.4 3.8
Note: Experiments in 2015 and 2020–2021 were conducted with moisture-charging irrigation.

Table data show that winter wheat was more responsive to pre-sowing application of granulated superphosphate. The yield increase compared to the control was 6% for spring wheat and 9% for winter wheat. In variants with humic fertilizer, absolute yield increases were higher, reaching 17% and 14%, respectively.

Effectiveness on Irrigated Lands

High effectiveness of localized fertilizer application was observed in corn cultivation on irrigated lands. Results are presented in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2. Influence of Humic Fertilizers Applied Locally During Sowing on Corn Grain Yield
Year and Location of Experiment Control Granulated Superphosphate, 40–50 kg/ha Humic Fertilizer, 2 l/ha
2015, Plot No.1 69.6 75.4 83.3
2016, Plot No.1 36.3 39.1 41.4
2020, Plot No.3 49.2 56.5 61.8
Average Yield Increase - 4.9 9.1
Table 3. Influence of Pre-Sowing Fertilization on Corn Green Mass Yield
Year and Location of Experiment Control Granulated Superphosphate, 40–50 kg/ha Humic Fertilizer, 2 l/ha
2019, Plot No.2 35.8 39.5 42.9
Average Yield Increase - 4.9 9.1

Application of organo-mineral humic fertilizer provided almost double the yield increase compared to superphosphate.

Experiments with Other Crops

Experiments with peas, sugar beets, and sunflower conducted on Plot No.1 showed that mineral fertilizers and organo-mineral humic fertilizer were equally effective (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4. Effectiveness of Pre-Sowing Fertilization for Sunflower and Peas
Experiment Variants Sunflower Yield, c/ha Pea Grain Yield, c/ha
Control 28.5 22.7
Granulated Superphosphate, 50 kg/ha 31.8 24.4
Humic Fertilizer, 2 l/ha 31.9 24.2
Note: Sunflower experiments were conducted on irrigated plots.
Table 5. Influence of Row Fertilization on Sugar Beet Yield
Experiment Variants 2018, Plot No.3 2019, Plot No.2 2021, Plot No.1
Control 324 349 443
NPK (Ammonium Nitrate 30 kg + Superphosphate 80 kg + Potassium Salt 20 kg/ha) 375 406 490
Humic Fertilizer, 1–2 l/ha 391 403 495

When using organo-mineral humic fertilizer, 2–3 times less mineral fertilizers were applied. Although no additional yield increase was observed for sunflower, peas, and sugar beets, mineral fertilizers combined with humic fertilizer were used more efficiently.

Experiments with Potatoes and Vegetable Crops

Experiments with potatoes and transplanted vegetable crops showed that localized application of organo-mineral humic fertilizers during planting is a highly effective method for increasing yield (Table 6).

Table 6. Influence of Adept Agro.Bio and Potassium Humate on Potato and Vegetable Crop Yields
Year and Location of Experiment Yield, c/ha
Control Potassium Humate, 2 l/ha + N20P20 Adept, 2 l/ha
Potatoes
2020, Plot No.1 166 193 -
2021, Plot No.1 139 153 156
Tomatoes
2016, Plot No.2 264 319 -
2017, Plot No.3 262 350 -
2018, Plot No.4 294 346 -
2018, Plot No.1 372 453 -
2021, Plot No.1 319 371 387
Lettuce Pepper
2020, Plot No.1 168 207 -
2021, Plot No.1 176 206 -
Early Cabbage
2020, Plot No.1 216 252 -
2021, Plot No.1 218 261 259
Eggplants
2020, Plot No.1 138 178 -
2021, Plot No.1 191 225 -
Note: "-" — no data.

Of particular interest are experiments with potatoes, tomatoes, and cabbage, where a variant with a mixture of 5 tons of manure, 1 quintal of ammonium sulfate, and 1 quintal of superphosphate was included. Despite applying 3–4 times more organic matter and 1.5 times more mineral fertilizers, the yield from this mixture and humic fertilizer was practically the same.

Table 7. Influence of Pre-Sowing Fertilization on Tomato and Cucumber Yields
Experiment Variants Tomato Yield, c/ha Cucumber Yield, c/ha
Control 250 255
Humic Fertilizer, 4 l/ha 300 310

Table 7 data confirm that the application of humic fertilizer is an effective method for increasing vegetable crop yields.

Table 8. Comparative Effectiveness of Humic Fertilizers Adept and Mind
Year and Crop Control Adept, 2 l/ha Mind, 2 l/ha
2019, Spring Wheat 18.5 21.0 20.8
2020, Winter Wheat 25.0 29.5 29.3
2021, Corn 50.0 60.0 59.8

The results indicate that humic fertilizers Adept and Mind are equally effective regardless of the organic component.

Table 9. Comparative Effectiveness of Adept, Potassium Humate, and Mineral Fertilizers
Crop Control Humic Fertilizer, 2 l/ha Superphosphate + Ammonium Sulfate (NP Equivalent)
Winter Wheat 25.0 29.5 27.0
Corn 50.0 60.0 55.0
Sugar Beet 350 400 370

Humic fertilizer showed significant advantages compared to equivalent amounts of mineral fertilizers.

Impact on Product Quality

Table 11. Influence of Humic Fertilizer on Wheat and Corn Grain Quality
Experiment Years Crop Indicator Nutrient Content, %
Control Humic Fertilizer
2014 Spring Wheat Protein 16.1 17.0
2015 Spring Wheat Protein 18.2 18.6
2019–2020 Winter Wheat Gluten 25.1 28.6
2020–2021 Winter Wheat Gluten 28.1 30.5
2016 Corn Protein 11.6 11.7
2020 Corn Protein 9.1 10.1
Table 12. Influence of Humic Fertilizer on Corn Green Mass Quality
Year Protein Content, %
2019 8.5 (Control), 9.0 (Humic Fertilizer)
Table 13. Influence of Humic Fertilizer on Sunflower Seed and Sugar Beet Root Quality
Indicator Year Control Humic Fertilizer
Fat in Sunflower Seeds, % 2019 45.0 46.9
Fat in Sunflower Seeds, % 2020 41.2 43.4
Sugar in Sugar Beet Roots, % 2018 17.7 18.2
Sugar in Sugar Beet Roots, % 2021 17.2 17.4
Table 14. Influence of Humic Fertilizer on Tomato Fruit Quality
Indicator Year Control Humic Fertilizer
Dry Matter in Juice, % 2019 5.90 6.00
Soluble Sugars, % 2019 2.20 3.60
Vitamin C, mg % 2019 55.9 58.6
Total Acidity, % 2019 0.50 0.48

Under the influence of humic fertilizer, the content of protein, gluten, fat, sugars, and vitamin C increased, improving product quality.

Table 15. Yield Payback per 1 kg of Active Mineral Fertilizer Substance
Crop When Applied at Agronomic Norms When Applied in Equivalent (NP) Norms
Spring Wheat 1.0 2.6
Winter Wheat 2.4 3.8
Corn (Grain) 4.9 9.1
Corn (Silage) - -
Sugar Beet 61 66
Potatoes - -
Tomatoes - -

Table 15 data prove the feasibility of using mineral fertilizers in combination with humic preparations, as each liter of active substance is compensated by a significantly larger amount of product.

Conclusions

  1. Localized application of organo-mineral humic fertilizers during sowing and planting is an effective method for increasing the yield of vegetable, grain, and industrial crops in the southern steppe zone of Ukraine.
  2. Under the influence of humic fertilizers, not only yield but also product quality improves, increasing the content of protein, sugar, fat, and other valuable substances.
  3. The combined use of mineral and humic fertilizers is economically rational, as it allows for more intensive land use and more efficient consumption of mineral fertilizers.

Write a review

Note: HTML is not translated!
    Bad           Good